MatchUp Tennis methodology: how our model analyzes ATP matches

MatchUp Tennis does not predict results. We analyze matchups to identify the situations where the market underrates a player.

Sommaire
Our philosophy Playing styles What we analyze The Speed Index The signals Per-player history The scale of our data Frequently asked questions

Our philosophy

Comprendre avant de parier

Most tipping sites hand you a “tip” with no explanation. We do the opposite: we show you pourquoi a player holds an edge in a given match, and we let you decide.

Playing style: the hidden variable

What we believe: playing style is the most underrated factor in tennis. Two players with the same ATP ranking can produce radically different results depending on the opponent’s style, court speed and match conditions.

That is what MatchUp Tennis captures. We don’t replace your judgment — we enrich it with data you won’t find anywhere else.

Playing styles

13 profiles to classify every ATP player

This is the heart of MatchUp Tennis. Every ATP player is classified into one of our 13 styles de jeu, built on dozens of parameters: serve patterns, return aggressiveness, rally management, performance under pressure, and more.

Matchups: some styles beat others

The idea: certains styles dominent certains autres. A Big Server dominates weak returners. A Counter Puncher neutralizes servers. An All-Court Elite adapts to everything. These matchup dynamics are measurable and predictive.

All-Court Elite
The best in the world. They dominate every style, every surface. Sinner, Alcaraz, Djokovic.
Big Server + Baseliner
Big serve + solid baseline game. Fritz, Shelton, Hurkacz. Dangerous on fast surfaces.
Attaquant de Fond (Power)
Raw baseline power. Zverev, Rublev. They dominate in rallies but have exploitable weaknesses.
Counter Puncher Offensif
Defense turned into attack. Medvedev. Excellent return, neutralizes servers.
Pur Terrien
Clay-court specialists. Patient construction, heavy topspin, excellence on clay.
Solid Aggressor (Server)
Complete players with the serve as their main strength. Griekspoor, Dimitrov, Nakashima.
Solid Aggressor (Returner)
Complete players who dominate through the return. Tommy Paul, Mannarino, Gasquet.
Solid Aggressor (Core)
Versatile players with no dominant statistical strength. Balanced profile.
Et 5 autres...
Big Server, Topspin Attacker, Erratic Attacker, Solid Defender, Serve & Volleyer. See the full matrix →

Our matrice 13×13 shows the historical win rate of each playing style against every other. It is our competitive edge — no other site does this analysis.

What we analyze for every match

For every match of the day, our proprietary model combines several layers of analysis :

The 6 dimensions of the v4.0 hybrid model

Playing-style matchup— How this player performs historically against this playing style
Elo by surface— A rating system adjusted for Hard / Clay / Grass since 2010
Recent form— Results over recent weeks
Court conditions— Vitesse de surface, indoor/outdoor, altitude
Fatigue & Charge— Matches and minutes played over recent days
H2H— The head-to-head history

These factors are combined by our proprietary algorithm to produce a win probability. When that probability differs significantly from what market odds imply, we detect value.

matchup-tennis.fr/app
Miami · Hard · 20:00 MODERATE VALUE
J. Sinner
All-Court Elite
68%
vs
32%
A. de Minaur
Counter Puncher Off.
87% 22mForm71% 18m
2208Elo surf.1897
75% 44mvs Style de jeu41% 17m
86% 22mMiami55% 11m
87% favFavorite60% fav
Match card with full comparison — every line helps you read the matchup

The Speed Index

Objectively measure each court’s speed

Not all courts are equal. A match on Wimbledon grass has nothing in common with Roland Garros clay. And even within one surface, pace varies enormously.

Our Speed Index (0-100) objectively measures each tournament’s pace from aggregated serve statistics. It is a unique tool for comparing playing conditions across tournaments.

Exemples de Speed Index
Roland Garros
27
Indian Wells
39
Miami
47
Australian Open
56
Cincinnati
63
Wimbledon
65

Every player has performance stats by speed band. A Big Server who thrives on fast courts (Speed 60+) can have a far lower WR on slow ones (Speed 20-). Our model factors this in.

Value signals

We don’t give a “tip”. We detect the gaps between our estimate and the market’s. When our model sees a probability significantly different from what the odds imply, we raise a signal.

Trois niveaux de confiance

STRONG VALUELarge gap with the market, confirmed by every one of our criteria
MODERATE VALUEGap detected with partial confirmation
SLIGHT EDGESignal detected with lower confidence

Every signal comes with confirmation criteria visible on the match card: Elo, Playing style, H2H and Fatigue. The more criteria align, the stronger the signal.

matchup-tennis.fr/app
STRONG VALUE Edge: +28.4%
Indian Wells · Hard
C. Norrie
Solid Defender
@ 5.00
vs A. de Minaur · Counter Puncher Offensif
✓ Style de jeu ✓ Forme ✓ H2H — Fatigue
Result: WIN +4.00u
STRONG VALUE signal detected — Norrie @ 5.00 against de Minaur, 3 criteria confirmed → win

Per-player history

For every match, you can review the Each player’s last 10 matches — overall and specifically against today’s opponent’s playing style.

It’s a powerful feature: if Sinner faces a Big Server, you immediately see his last 10 matches against Big Servers, with scores and results. That gives you concrete context, not just a percentage.

matchup-tennis.fr/app · Historique
Sinner vs Big Server + Baseliner — last 10 matches
Wvs Hurkacz6-3 6-4Miami 2026
Wvs Fritz6-4 7-6AO 2026
Lvs Shelton6-7 4-6Shanghai 2025
Wvs Hurkacz7-6 6-3Wimbledon 2025
Wvs Fritz6-4 6-4RG 2025
Record: 4W - 1L (80%)
History filtered by playing style — here, Sinner’s matches against Big Server + Baseliners

The scale of our data

Our database
1,117players profiled and classified by playing style 200K+ATP + Challenger matches since 2010 447tournaments with a computed Speed Index 13playing styles with a matchup matrix 2hautomatic update frequency

Data is collected in real time and cross-referenced with our historical base. Every match is automatically enriched with serve stats, recent results and player workload.

Frequently asked questions

How does MatchUp Tennis predict ATP tennis matches?

Our v4.0 hybrid model combines each player’s individual win rate against his opponent’s playing style (60%) with the historical edge between playing styles (40%), adjusted by an Elo system per surface computed on 200K+ matches since 2010.

What are the 13 playing styles?

All-Court Elite, Big Server + Baseliner, Baseline Attacker (Power), Offensive Counterpuncher, Clay-Court Specialist, Solid Aggressor (Server), Solid Aggressor (Returner), Solid Aggressor (Core), Big Server, Baseline Attacker (Topspin), Erratic Attacker, Solid Defender and Serve & Volleyer. Each player is classified by his serve, return, rally and under-pressure patterns.

What is a STRONG VALUE signal?

A STRONG VALUE signal fires when our model detects a gap of at least 25% between a player’s estimated probability and the one implied by market odds, with a minimum 60% blended probability.

Ready to analyze the matchups?

Check today’s matches with every signal and detail.

See today’s matches →